职业网络成瘾者 • 游戏爱好者 • 技术创造者
职业网络成瘾者 • 游戏爱好者 • 技术创造者

如何将图像存储为 JavaScript 变量,然后存储在图像标签中

这是一种将图像嵌入 HTML 和 CSS 中以减少 HTTP 请求数量的方法!
为了方便您使用,本页面由我热情高涨的 AI 实习生从英文翻译而来。他们仍在学习中,因此可能存在一些错误。为了获得最准确的信息,请参考英文版本。
博客 如何将图像存储为 JavaScript 变量,然后存储在图像标签中

请注意,本博文发布于2011年7月,因此根据您阅读的时间,某些部分可能已过时。遗憾的是,我无法始终保持这些文章的完全更新,以确保信息的准确性。

    Storing an image (or any other content type) in JavaScript (or CSS) is done by specifying a special URI scheme for data. Basically what you do is to create a normal JavaScript String object using a specific format, where you specify the content type, character encoding and the data encoded as a base64 string.
    A simple example would be:
    A simple example
    Resulting in one HTML page with an embedded image.
    Preview image
    Viewing the page with Firefox with the YSlow plugin.
    Compression overview

    Increased file size

    Obviously converting raw binary data to a base64 format will increase the data size. To compare the sizes I extracted the JavaScript image variable to an own JavaScript file on the disk, and then compared the original image file against the newly created JavaScript file.
    File comparison
    The original image is around 25.5 KB large while the base64 version is around 34 KB. The data size was increased with around 33.3%.
    Encoding other various files I got the following results:
    • 7.45 KB to 10.2 KB - 36.9%
    • 5.19 KB to 7.10 KB - 36.8%
    • 93.2 KB to 127.0 KB - 36.2%
    • 257.0 KB to 350.0 KB - 36.1%
    • 48.0 KB to 64.3 KB - 33.9%
    • 457.0 KB to 642.0 KB - 40.4%
    • 601.0 KB to 821.0 KB - 36.6%
    Based on these figures a typical base64 encoding increases the data size with around one third (36%) of the file size. However, this size can of course later be decreased by using GZIP compression.However, this size can of course later be decreased by using GZIP compression.

    Browser compatibility

    According to several sources, the Data URI scheme are only supported in modern browsers, really starting from Internet Explorer 8 and forward (Internet Explorer 7 does support it, but with some heavy constraints).
    As an experiment uploaded my test page and used Browsershot to give me a screen shot of the page from 65 different browsers on various operating systems.
    65 different combinations of browsers and operating systems.
    Browser screenshots
    As displayed above, it works on Firefox 3.6+, Chrome 9.0+, Safari 3.2.3+, Opera 9.54+ and Internet Explorer 8+. But not in Internet Explorer 6 or 7. However, there is an alternative solution available for those browsers as well.

    Is Data URI scheme a good or a bad idea?

    I won't cover this question in this blog post. However if you are interested here are some links that highlights the advantages and the disadvantages:

    作者:Special Agent Squeaky。首次发布于2011年7月29日。最后更新于2011年7月29日。

    📺 快来看看 Squeaky 的最新视频!

    如何为您的直播添加简单的实时字幕